Wellington Citrus Orchard: HET14_WCO
This page provides descriptions of the architectural, spectral and illumination
related properties of a 9 year old citrus orchard located in Wellington, South Africa
(33°36′S 18°56′E). The scene is
based on data provided courtesy of Jan Stuckens, Ben Somers and colleagues (from the Katholieke
Universiteit Leuven in Belgium)
who carried out a detailed measurement campaign at this site in 2006/2007 and
transferred their findings into a detailed 3D canopy architecture representation suitable for
ingestion into RT models.
Thus, potential RAMI participants are to treat the information presented
on this page as actual 'inventory data', that is, they should identify/extract those
parameters and characteristics that are required as input to their canopy reflectance
models. In some cases this may mean that simplifications have to be made to the
available information, or, that parts of the available information can not be exploited
with a given radiative transfer model. Whatever the case may be, all potential RAMI participants
should mimic the standard practices that they use when matching actual field
measurements to the required set(s) of input parameters of their model(s). If this means that you need
more information than provided, please do not hesitate in contacting us.
Last but not least, for those 3D models capable of maintaining architectural fidelity down to the
individual shoot and branch level a series of ASCII (text) files containing the Cartesian coordinates
of various geometric primitives (triangles, spheres and cylinders) and their transformations will be
given. This should facilitate the reconstruction of the citrus orchard canopy architecture as it is
described on this page.
In order to facilitate the generation of the citrus orchard
the information on this page has been subdivided into four different categories. For each
one of these categories the relevant descriptions will be contained within a uniquely coloured
text frame and can be accessed by clicking on one of the four links below:
In case of difficulties or missing data on this page please do not hesitate in contacting us so that the problems may be resolved as fast as possible.
Architectural information 
1) General canopy characteristics
The Wellington Citrus Orchard scene is generated over an area of approximately 100×100 m² . The center of the coordinate system
lies almost in the middle of the scene. The rows of the orchard fall along constant X-coordinate values (i.e., parallel to the Y axis)
and are separated by approximatively 4.5 m. In a given row neighbouring trees are separated by approximatively 2.0 m. However, 11% of the potential
tree positions are void due to missing trees. Overall, the architectural characteristics of the scene are thus as follows:
Scene dimensions: (ΔX × ΔY × ΔZ) |
108.25 × 103.90 × 4.12 [m × m × m] |
| (Xmin, Ymin, Zmin) |
−54.10, −51.95, 0.0 [m, m, m] |
| (Xmax, Ymax, Zmax) |
54.10, 51.95, 4.12 [m, m, m] |
| Inter-row distance |
4.5 [m] |
| |
| Number of trees in scene |
1115 [-] |
| Leaf Area Index of scene |
2.69126 [m² ⁄ m²] |
| Fractional scene coverage* |
0.392 [-] |
| Inter-tree distance (within a row) |
2.0 [m] |
|
*The fractional cover is defined as 1 - direct transmission at zero solar zenith angle.
2) Foliage structure
The table below provides the structural characteristics of the leaves (citrus sinensis L.) that feature within the Wellington Citrus Orchard.
Indicated are average properties since the leaves within a single tree vary somewhat in their size and shape.
foliage shape description: |
 |
| Average leaf length |
8.8 cm ±1.9cm |
| Average leaf width |
60 % of leaf length |
| mean one-sided foliage area |
31.22 cm² |
| foliage curlo |
20% |
|
| o |
Foliage curl in percent is defined as 100 times the length of the leaf divided by the circumference of a cylinder around which it is wrapped. E.g.,
0% leaf curl mean - the leaf is flat - and the radius of the imaginary cylinder is infinite. 100% leaf curl mean - both ends of the
leaf touch - and the radius of the cylinder around which the leaf is wrapped is equal to leaflength ⁄ 2 π.
|
|
3) Tree structure
The Wellington Citrus Orchard is generated on the basis of 10 individual tree representations of the citrus sinensis L. species.
The table below provides an overview of some structural characteristics of these 10 tree representations. For those RT models capable
of representing the 3D architecture of a given trees through a series of geometric primitives, the last three lines of each table contain links to
data files with detailed specifications of the foliage and wood structural properties of the Wellington Citrus Orchard trees.
|
|
|
= | Rather than spanning the full range of possible zenith angles (i.e.,
from 0 to 180 degree) as could be expected for non-flat asymmetric objects, it was chosen to follow the convention of foliage normals pointing only into the upper hemisphere. This
is because RAMI participants, that make use of this foliage normal distribution information, will in all likelihood have models where scatterers are represented as flat (disc or
equilateral triangle shaped) objects. However, should your model require a description of the foliage normal zenith angle distribution up to 180 degrees then please do not hesitate
in contacting us and we will provide this information to you. For both the zenith and azimuth angle distributions the 'graph' link shows an image of the normalised foliage normal
distribution versus zenith (or azimuth) angle of the foliage normal. The 'data' files for the zenith and azimuth angle distribution have three columns indicating 1) the upper value of the zenith (or
azimuth) angle in a given bin, 2) the normalised amount of foliage area having a normal in this zenith (or azimuth) angle range, and 3) the normalised amount of wood area having a
normal that falls in this zenith (or azimuth) angle range. Bin angle widths were chosen to be 5 degrees and 10 degrees for zenith and azimuth angles, respectively.
| |
x | The crown radius of actual trees is varying with azimuth angle. This can be seen in the various pictures showing a perspective-free nadir view of a
given tree located at x=0,y=0 (concentric circles indicate the distance from the origin in steps of 0.25m). The mean and maximum values were computed from the triangle objects making up the 3D trees
depicted in the picture in the the third-last row of each table column.
| |
* | The graphs show the maximum radial distance of foliage elements in a given height interval plotted against the lower height level of that height interval. The data files have five columns: lower-height-of-bin-in-units-of-meters   upper-height-of-bin-in-units-of-meters   minimum_radial-distance_of_foliage-in-units-of-m   maximum_radial-distance_of_foliage-in-units-of-m.   mean_radial-distance_of_foliage-in-units-of-m
| |
o | The data files have 3 columns: lower-height-of-bin-in-units-of-meters   upper-height-of-bin-in-units-of-meters   area-of-wood-or-foliage-in-units-of-m2.
|
|
4) Stand structure
The Wellington Citrus Orchard is composed of 1115 individual trees. The following table indicates how these trees are distributed among the above tree
classes and specifies the respective x,y locations of the tree centers of each tree class in the scene. The last row of each table contains an ASCII file with
tree translation information for those RT models capable of ingesting the detailed 3D architecture of the tree models specified in the previous section.

Tree locations for the Wellington Citrus Orchard. The origin of the coordinate system is in the center of the image.
RAMI participants with 3D RT models capable of representing objects using geometric primitives can download a single compressed ZIP archive with all the tree architectural
ASCII information that is listed in the above tables by clicking HERE. Note: The size of the compressed archive
is about 12 megabytes. It contains 30 ASCII files and can be unzipped using 'WINZIP' on windows or 'unzip' on linux/unix operating systems. Beware that
the inflated archive will take up 80 Megabytes of storage.
|
spectral canopy characteristics 
|
Each one of the ten trees in the Wellington Citrus Orchard scene features distinct foliage spectral properties.
All of the foliage, wood and background components in the Wellington Citrus Orchard scene feature LAMBERTIAN scattering properties. The tables
below contains various spectral characteristics for nineteen different spectral bands. The experimental identifier for the Wellington Citrus Orchard
scene is given by HET14_WCO_$$$_B**_## where $$$ relates to the solar azimuth angle,
B** relates to the spectral bands (B01, B02, …, B19) and ## relates to the solar zenith angle.
A text file that resumes all of the information in this table can be found here.
foliage:
|
| spectral identifier | B01 | B02 | B03 | B04 | B05 | B06 | B07 | B08 | B09 | B10 |
| CISI1 leaf reflectance | 0.04294 | 0.04739 | 0.12966 | 0.17462 | 0.15889 | 0.09033 | 0.05870 | 0.05043 | 0.17236 | 0.30665 |
| CISI1 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00001 | 0.03246 | 0.05475 | 0.04566 | 0.02101 | 0.00696 | 0.00449 | 0.05455 | 0.11984 |
| CISI2 leaf reflectance | 0.04070 | 0.04384 | 0.11144 | 0.15019 | 0.13446 | 0.07589 | 0.05385 | 0.04841 | 0.14530 | 0.26870 |
| CISI2 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00010 | 0.03151 | 0.04540 | 0.03644 | 0.01506 | 0.00433 | 0.00261 | 0.04401 | 0.10475 |
| CISI3 leaf reflectance | 0.04213 | 0.04488 | 0.11490 | 0.15632 | 0.13882 | 0.07460 | 0.05106 | 0.04603 | 0.14882 | 0.28165 |
| CISI3 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.02486 | 0.04343 | 0.03526 | 0.01463 | 0.00423 | 0.00256 | 0.04290 | 0.10228 |
| CISI4 leaf reflectance | 0.04276 | 0.04864 | 0.15879 | 0.21783 | 0.20285 | 0.11841 | 0.07209 | 0.05795 | 0.21616 | 0.36594 |
| CISI4 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00002 | 0.04748 | 0.07717 | 0.06727 | 0.03651 | 0.01500 | 0.01068 | 0.07879 | 0.15101 |
| CISI5 leaf reflectance | 0.04698 | 0.05136 | 0.14010 | 0.20027 | 0.19160 | 0.11819 | 0.07920 | 0.06480 | 0.20760 | 0.35612 |
| CISI5 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.03211 | 0.06096 | 0.05275 | 0.02691 | 0.01011 | 0.00693 | 0.06345 | 0.12936 |
| CISI6 leaf reflectance | 0.04621 | 0.05225 | 0.12572 | 0.16623 | 0.15300 | 0.09567 | 0.07103 | 0.06220 | 0.16104 | 0.27964 |
| CISI6 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00001 | 0.03189 | 0.05257 | 0.04355 | 0.01961 | 0.00629 | 0.00400 | 0.05224 | 0.11673 |
| CISI7 leaf reflectance | 0.03767 | 0.03902 | 0.10368 | 0.13921 | 0.12064 | 0.06187 | 0.04235 | 0.03912 | 0.12955 | 0.25343 |
| CISI7 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00001 | 0.02626 | 0.04317 | 0.03460 | 0.01383 | 0.00379 | 0.00223 | 0.04186 | 0.10193 |
| CISI8 leaf reflectance | 0.03810 | 0.03976 | 0.09460 | 0.12547 | 0.10869 | 0.05798 | 0.04233 | 0.03975 | 0.11784 | 0.23170 |
| CISI8 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00002 | 0.02414 | 0.03691 | 0.02879 | 0.01055 | 0.00257 | 0.00142 | 0.03528 | 0.09130 |
| CISI9 leaf reflectance | 0.04305 | 0.04831 | 0.15415 | 0.21719 | 0.20474 | 0.12018 | 0.07150 | 0.05720 | 0.22984 | 0.38880 |
| CISI9 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00000 | 0.03628 | 0.06623 | 0.05771 | 0.03045 | 0.01199 | 0.00839 | 0.06889 | 0.13621 |
| CISI10 leaf reflectance | 0.04030 | 0.04457 | 0.13445 | 0.18579 | 0.17094 | 0.09667 | 0.06057 | 0.05033 | 0.18281 | 0.32631 |
| CISI10 leaf transmittance | 0.00000 | 0.00001 | 0.03326 | 0.05771 | 0.04878 | 0.02342 | 0.00820 | 0.00544 | 0.05827 | 0.12404 |
| |
| spectral identifier | B11 | B12 | B13 | B14 | B15 | B16 | B17 | B18 | B19 |
| CISI1 leaf reflectance | 0.39025 | 0.61079 | 0.62964 | 0.63744 | 0.64408 | 0.64362 | 0.64345 | 0.63071 | 0.5 |
| CISI1 leaf transmittance | 0.16526 | 0.29690 | 0.31010 | 0.32024 | 0.33066 | 0.33171 | 0.33192 | 0.32757 | 0.5 |
| CISI2 leaf reflectance | 0.35263 | 0.60019 | 0.62285 | 0.63173 | 0.63850 | 0.63792 | 0.63783 | 0.62691 | 0.5 |
| CISI2 leaf transmittance | 0.15034 | 0.29520 | 0.31033 | 0.32110 | 0.33160 | 0.33267 | 0.33290 | 0.32895 | 0.5 |
| CISI3 leaf reflectance | 0.37023 | 0.61210 | 0.63324 | 0.64197 | 0.64849 | 0.64798 | 0.64784 | 0.63591 | 0.5 |
| CISI3 leaf transmittance | 0.14684 | 0.28747 | 0.30214 | 0.31278 | 0.32336 | 0.32444 | 0.32467 | 0.32074 | 0.5 |
| CISI4 leaf reflectance | 0.44632 | 0.61697 | 0.62918 | 0.63434 | 0.63985 | 0.63900 | 0.63875 | 0.62511 | 0.5 |
| CISI4 leaf transmittance | 0.19498 | 0.30567 | 0.31620 | 0.32532 | 0.33539 | 0.33641 | 0.33664 | 0.33280 | 0.5 |
| CISI5 leaf reflectance | 0.44050 | 0.63039 | 0.64477 | 0.65024 | 0.65543 | 0.65447 | 0.65415 | 0.64186 | 0.5 |
| CISI5 leaf transmittance | 0.17176 | 0.28440 | 0.29552 | 0.30522 | 0.31614 | 0.31726 | 0.31751 | 0.31364 | 0.5 |
| CISI6 leaf reflectance | 0.35929 | 0.60086 | 0.62436 | 0.63464 | 0.64089 | 0.64014 | 0.63992 | 0.62771 | 0.5 |
| CISI6 leaf transmittance | 0.16236 | 0.29749 | 0.31121 | 0.32168 | 0.33245 | 0.33353 | 0.33375 | 0.32937 | 0.5 |
| CISI7 leaf reflectance | 0.33959 | 0.59255 | 0.61604 | 0.62567 | 0.63220 | 0.63163 | 0.63147 | 0.61989 | 0.5 |
| CISI7 leaf transmittance | 0.14800 | 0.29855 | 0.31447 | 0.32552 | 0.33616 | 0.33727 | 0.33753 | 0.33415 | 0.5 |
| CISI8 leaf reflectance | 0.31534 | 0.58455 | 0.61145 | 0.62359 | 0.63141 | 0.63079 | 0.63066 | 0.61888 | 0.5 |
| CISI8 leaf transmittance | 0.13666 | 0.29591 | 0.31345 | 0.32513 | 0.33595 | 0.33706 | 0.33730 | 0.33353 | 0.5 |
| CISI9 leaf reflectance | 0.47156 | 0.63837 | 0.64995 | 0.65475 | 0.65941 | 0.65837 | 0.65799 | 0.64286 | 0.5 |
| CISI9 leaf transmittance | 0.17821 | 0.28617 | 0.29666 | 0.30592 | 0.31637 | 0.31744 | 0.31768 | 0.31387 | 0.5 |
| CISI10 leaf reflectance | 0.41180 | 0.61419 | 0.63048 | 0.63872 | 0.64875 | 0.64805 | 0.64788 | 0.63458 | 0.5 |
| CISI10 leaf transmittance | 0.16833 | 0.29177 | 0.30398 | 0.31374 | 0.32409 | 0.32514 | 0.32537 | 0.32142 | 0.5 |
|
wood:
|
| spectral identifier | B01 | B02 | B03 | B04 | B05 | B06 | B07 | B08 | B09 | B10 |
| CISI* wood reflectance | 0.07052 | 0.09153 | 0.12861 | 0.14611 | 0.15653 | 0.18306 | 0.18050 | 0.17844 | 0.25207 | 0.28567 |
| |
| spectral identifier | B11 | B12 | B13 | B14 | B15 | B16 | B17 | B18 | B19 |
| CISI* wood reflectance | 0.30076 | 0.34585 | 0.35729 | 0.38836 | 0.47928 | 0.49691 | 0.50321 | 0.54796 | 1.0 |
|
background:
|
| spectral identifier | B01 | B02 | B03 | B04 | B05 | B06 | B07 | B08 | B09 | B10 |
| background reflectance | 0.06743 | 0.07678 | 0.12233 | 0.13788 | 0.13382 | 0.12464 | 0.12142 | 0.12106 | 0.15362 | 0.18914 |
| |
| spectral identifier | B11 | B12 | B13 | B14 | B15 | B16 | B17 | B18 | B19 |
| background reflectance |
0.21593 | 0.32495 | 0.33878 | 0.35202 | 0.37159 | 0.37501 | 0.37721 | 0.39722 | 1.0 |
|
|
illumination characteristics 
|
Five different illumination conditions are to be simulated for the Wellington Citrus Orchard. More specifically the solar zenith angle (SZA)
is 0, 20 or 50 degrees and the solar azimuth angle is equal to 0 or 90 degree. Only direct solar radiation is to be considered in these experiments.
The experimental identifier <EXP> that is needed in the naming of the various measurement results files (see file naming
and formatting conventions) for the Wellington Citrus Orchard scene is given by HET14_WCO_$$$_B**_## where $$$ relates to the solar azimuth angle,
B** relates to the spectral bands (B01, B02, …, B19) and ## relates to the solar zenith angle. The following image shows the experimental identifiers of the various
experiments (right hand side) together with the correct solar azimuth (yellow) and zenith (white) angle overlaid onto the orchard geometry (left hand side).
|
measurement characteristics 
|
The experimental identifier <EXP> that is needed in the naming of the various measurement results files (see file naming
and formatting conventions) for the Wellington Citrus Orchard scene scene is given by HET14_WCO_$$$_B**_## where $$$ relates to the solar azimuth angle,
B** relates to the spectral bands (B01, B02, …, B19) and ## relates to the solar zenith angle. For each one of these scenarios a series of radiative measurements should be
performed. In addition a lidar experiment, and a fisheye experiment are proposed.
The following are the prescribed measurements for the Wellington Citrus Orchard:
|
Prior to the performing of any RT model simulations, please refer to the
'definitions'
pages for detailed instructions regarding the angular sign conventions
for BRF simulations, as well as other RT model technicalities. Also
read the relevant file naming
and formatting conventions that must be adhered to by all participants.
In addition, RAMI-IV offers participants the possibility to test the compliance
of their model-generated results files with these file-naming and formatting
convention, prior to their submission via ftp: To do so follow the
on-line format checker link that appears in the top navigation bar
during the active submission period.