Go to top
European Commission logo
English
RAMI website

The new RAMI4ATM

2022 - on going

  1. April 2022 - November 2022
    Active submission period
  2. March 2023
    Preliminary analysis and publication period

RAMI4ATM is a new initiative dedicated to the benchmarking of coupled surface-atmosphere radiative transfer models. RAMI4ATM will thus expand RAdiation transfer Model Intercomparison (RAMI) to the simulation of satellite observations.

Compared to previous RAMI benchmarks, the major difference is that RAMI4ATM will account for atmospheric radiative effects occurring between the surface and the simulated signal reaching a given spaceborne radiometer. Sentinel-2A/MSI spectral bands has been chosen for that purpose. Models participating in RAMI4ATM should support the simulation of radiative processes at the surface, in the atmosphere and account for the radiative coupling between the two.

Over the past decades, many radiative transfer models have been developed and are widely used in Earth Observation for e.g., vicarious calibration, lookup table generation for atmospheric correction or sensitivity analyses. Many of these models ship atmospheric property databases. Subcomponents of these models have been extensively tested in ideal conditions but so far, no long-term initiative similar to RAMI has been undertaken to systematically compare models when they are used to simulate actual remote sensing observations. The uncertainties of these models have not been clearly assessed in realistic usage conditions when supporting typical Earth Observation applications by remote sensing scientists. Surface properties will be defined by the simple homogeneous scenes as defined in previous RAMI phases.

This new phase is oriented toward the support of calibration and validation activities relying on the use of radiative transfer models for the simulation of satellite observations in the visible, near and shortwave infrared spectral regions. It is therefore primarily directed at model users involved in calibration and validation activities. Participation from radiative transfer model developers is however also welcome. They are referenced as expert users in RAMI4ATM. When relevant in the various scenarios descriptions, specific information for model and expert users are made available.

Finally, during this RAMI phase, special care will be taken to provide a computation priority order so that teams that do not have time to generate all the scenarios can focus on the most relevant ones.

Similarly to RAMI-1, the primary expected outcome of RAMI4ATM will be to document the variability between coupled surface-atmosphere models when run under well-controlled, but realistic, conditions. A second objective will be to quantify the impact of relying on models build-in features as opposed to a rigorous model comparions. This outcome might be particularly relevant for modelling studies concerning radiometric vicarious calibration activities.



RAMI4ATM covers various scenarios resulting from a combination of surface and atmospheric properties. Specifically, the following cases are foreseen:

  • A standard atmospheric profile is considered with the possibility to rescale the water vapour and ozone total column concentration;
  • Small particles (continental) and large particles (desert) aerosol types with different low and high optical thickness;
  • A total of eight surfaces are foreseen: three lambertian surfaces, two anisotropic surfaces and three homogeneous discrete canopies with isotropic background and different leaf angle distributions (LAD);
  • Simulations are performed in the blue, green, red, NIR and SWIR spectral regions corresponding to Sentinel-2A MSI bands M02, M03, M04, M8A, M11 and M12.

As already stressed, specifc information is provided to the model users and expert users when relevant. It is expected that model users rely as much as possible on built-in features of the models they are using to perform the simulations. Detailed information is provided to the expert users to allow them to simulate the scenarios in a rigorous and controlled way.

These simulations should be performed in the specified MSI bands. The simulated observation geometry does not correspond to the one of MSI but has been restricted to the principal and orthogonal planes as for RAMI-I to -IV phases for fixed sun angles. Such configuration eases a first model comparisons.


Scenario Combinations


A combination of different atmospheric properties are regrouped in seven atmosphere types. These types are illustrated in Figure 1 and described in more details in the Atmospheres section.


Scenario combinations
Figure 1: Atmosphere components combinations


The different surfaces are represented with the symbols in Figure 2. They are described in the Surfaces section.

Surfaces
Figure 2: Schematical representation of the eight surfaces considered in RAMI4ATM. From left to right we defined three Lambertian surfaces with no vegetation component (WHIte, BLAck, LAMbertian), two anisotropic surfaces defined in terms of the RPV (RPV) and Ross-Li Reciprocal (RLI) BRDF functions, and three homogeneous discrete canopies with isotropic background and different LAD (UNI, ERE, PLA).


The overall combinations of surface and atmospheric properties are represented in this Figure 3:

Surfaces
Figure 3: Combinations of surface and atmospheric properties.


Due to the large number of experiments, a priority order is proposed for each parameter (either in atmospheres, surfaces or bands) to make sure that we benchmark enough RAMI4ATM models with this set of priority 1 experiments.


Parameter X Priority
value1 2
value2 1
value3 3

Following the priority order, value2 should be computed first, then value1 and finally value3.


Experiments

In RAMI4ATM each individual experiment is identified as a combination of a scenario, a band, an illumination geometry and a measurement.

Access to descriptions of the various scenario contents and measurements can be obtained by clicking on the each specific item.


Output Filename and Formats

As in previous RAMI phases the model results should be submitted accordingly to a common filename and content format.

  • This dedicated page provides guidance to the filename convention, which consists of a combination of tags identifying the scenario, the spectral band, the illumination geometry and the measure.
  • The content of the submitted files depend on the measurement performed. The links to all format description pages are grouped in this table.

JSON file to setup RAMI4ATM experiments


A JSON file is a file that stores simple data structures and objects in JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) format, which is a standard data interchange format.

The scenarios described on this website are also available in RAMI4ATM experiments description JSON file: here is an example of a scenario written in JSON format.

{
  "name": "HOM00_BLA_S00S_M02_z30a000",
  "observations": [
    {
      "name": "HOM00_BLA_S00S_M02_z30a000",
      "atmosphere": {
        "name": "S00S",
        "atmosphere_type": "Rayleigh",
        "atmospheric_profile": "US Standard",
        "concentrations": null,
        "levels": [],
        "aerosols": []
      },
      "surface": {
        "name": "BLA",
        "surface_type": "Lambertian",
        "surface_parameters": { "reflectance": 0.0 }
      },
      "illumination": {
        "name": "z30a000", 
        "sza": { "value": 30.0, "units": "degree" },
        "saa": { "value": 0.0, "units": "degree"}
      },
      "canopy": null,
      "measures": [
        {
          "name": "brfpp",
          "satellite": "Sentinel-2A",
          "instrument": "MSI",
          "bands": ["2"],
          "measure_type": "brfpp",
          "delta_vaa": { "value": 180.0, "units": "degree" },
          "vza_start": { "value": 1.0, "units": "degree"},
          "vza_end": { "value": 75.0, "units": "degree"},
          "vza_step": { "value": 2.0, "units": "degree"},
          "height": { "value": 120, "units": "km" }
        },
        {
          "name": "brfpp",
          "satellite": "Sentinel-2A",
          "instrument": "MSI",
          "bands": ["2"],
          "measure_type": "brfpp",
          "delta_vaa": { "value": 0.0, "units": "degree" },
          "vza_start": { "value": 1.0, "units": "degree"},
          "vza_end": { "value": 75.0, "units": "degree"},
          "vza_step": { "value": 2.0, "units": "degree"},
          "height": { "value": 120, "units": "km" }
        },
        ...
      ]
    }
  ]
}

This example is a simple atmosphere scenario with only molecular (or Rayleigh) scattering involved on top of a black surface, without any canopy or aerosol layers. Observation is performed in the principal plane within MSI band M02 for a sun zenith angle of 30°.

The dotted notation is also used in the RAMI4ATM pages to refer to the parameters present in the JSON scenario file. For instance, the surface type of the above example can be refered by scenario.observations.surface.surface_type. The value of this surface type is Lambertian. The reflectance of this surface is at location scenario.observations.surface.surface_parameters.reflectance, and its value is 0.0. The dotted notation is also used in the RAMI4ATM pages to refer to the parameters present in the JSON scenario file. For instance, the surface type of the above example can be refered by scenario.observations.surface.surface_type. The value of this surface type is Lambertian. The reflectance of this surface is at location scenario.observations.surface.surface_parameters.reflectance, and its value is 0.0.


RAMI On-line Format Checker


Using the link below it is possible to examine:


RAMI On-line Model Submission


After checking model results files, using the previous tool, participants can submit their results by clicking on Model Submission link to open the dedicated page.



References


[1] Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance
F.E. Nicodemus, J.C. Richmond, J.J. Hsia, I.W. Ginsberg and T. Limperis, Geometrical Considerations and Nomenclature for Reflectance (1977), In: National Bureau of Standards, US Department of Commerce, Washington, D.C..
English
(PDF)
Online
[2] Simple Beta Distribution Representation of Leaf Orientation in Vegetation Canopies
N. S. Goel and D. E. Strebel, Simple Beta Distribution Representation of Leaf Orientation in Vegetation Canopies (1984),Agronomy Journal, 76, 800-803, DOI: 10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600050021x.
English
(PDF)
Online
[3] Technical Report AFGL-TR-86-0110
G.P. Anderson, J.H Chetwynd, S.A. Clough, E.P. Shettle, and F.X. Kneizys, AFGL atmospheric constituent profiles (0.120km). Technical Report AFGL-TR-86-0110 (1986), Air Force Geophysics Laboratory.
English
(PDF)
Online
[4] Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy
X. Li and A. H. Strahler,Geometric-Optical Bidirectional Reflectance Modeling of a Conifer Forest Canopy (1986), in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. GE-24, no. 6, pp. 906-919, DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.1986.289706.
English
(PDF)
Online
[5] A bidirectional reflectance model of the Earth's surface for the correction of remote sensing data
J.-L. Roujean, M. Leroy and P.-Y. Deschamps, A bidirectional reflectance model of the Earth's surface for the correction of remote sensing data (1992) in Journal of Geophysical Research, 97 (D18), 20455–20468, DOI: 10.1029/92JD01411.
English
(PDF)
Online
[6] Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model. 1. Model description and inversion on synthetic data
H. Rahman, M. M. Verstraete and B. Pinty , Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model: 1. Model description and inversion on synthetic data (1993) in Journal of Geophysical Research, 98, 20,779-20,789, DOI: 10.1029/93JD02071.
English
(PDF)
Online
[7] Issues in Reflectance measurement.
D. L. Jupp, Issues in Reflectance measurement. (1997), CSIRO Earth Observation Centre.
English
(PDF)
Online
[8] MODIS BRDF/Albedo Product: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document Version 5.0.
A. H. Strahler, J.-P. Muller, MODIS Science Team Members, MODIS BRDF/Albedo Product: Algorithm Theoretical Basis Document Version 5.0 (1999).
English
(PDF)
Online
[9] Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing-definitions and case studies.
G. Schaepman-Strub, M.E. Schaepman, T.H. Painter, S. Dangel and J.V. Martonchik,, Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing-definitions and case studies (2006), Remote Sensing of Environment, 103, Issue 1, Pages 27-42, ISSN 0034-4257, DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.03.002.
English
(PDF)
Online

Acknowledgments


RAMI4ATM is co-sponsored by Copernicus through Eradiate project (Rayference/ESA).